The Girl Before – JP Delaney


Publisher: Random House Audio

Publication Date: January 24, 2017

Listening Length: 9 hours and 59 minutes

From the Jacket:

Please make a list of every possession you consider essential to your life.

The request seems odd, even intrusive—and for the two women who answer, the consequences are devastating.

Reeling from a traumatic break-in, Emma wants a new place to live. But none of the apartments she sees are affordable or feel safe. Until One Folgate Street. The house is an architectural masterpiece: a minimalist design of pale stone, plate glass, and soaring ceilings. But there are rules. The enigmatic architect who designed the house retains full control: no books, no throw pillows, no photos or clutter or personal effects of any kind. The space is intended to transform its occupant—and it does.

After a personal tragedy, Jane needs a fresh start. When she finds One Folgate Street she is instantly drawn to the space—and to its aloof but seductive creator. Moving in, Jane soon learns about the untimely death of the home’s previous tenant, a woman similar to Jane in age and appearance. As Jane tries to untangle truth from lies, she unwittingly follows the same patterns, makes the same choices, crosses paths with the same people, and experiences the same terror, as the girl before.

Unpopular opinion time. I absolutely loathed this book. I hate finished it just because I thought surely, at some point with all of the rave reviews I read, it would get better.

Spoiler alert: It did not get any better.

There were only two redeeming factors for me. The first, was listening to the audio version. Emilia Fox and Finty Williams do a lovely job narrating this terrible content. The second, was doing a buddy read with my wife. She had print and I had audio, and we must be soulmates because we equally abhorred it. I’m going to go into detail about my issues with this book below, so this post will be spoiler central. You’ve been warned.

I went into this book thinking that it would be a psychological thriller about a super intelligent house that interferes with the lives of the women who live there. Turns out its actually about a moderately smart house with outdated technology, the wealthy sociopath who designed it, and the women who (completely inexplicably) fall for him. This book was rated highly by multiple sources that I have a lot of respect for. It was compared with The Girl on the Train, The Silent Wife, and Gone Girl. This book is like none of those books at all.

Let’s start with the way that every women in the book falls all over herself when they lay eyes on Edward. They all comment on how incredibly handsome he is. Really? I won’t get into all of the reasons why it is incredibly unrealistic that every single woman would be attracted to this guy, but I do feel like its worth noting. First impressions aside, he’s also completely weird, controlling, judgmental, and all around awful. Delaney describes the intense chemistry between Jane/Edward and Emma/Edward without providing any believable details. Saying someone has the best sex of their life is not the same as writing believable sex scenes.

I also almost lost my eyes to the back of my head due to the eye rolling that happened while I was reading the details of Jane’s pregnancies. It’s like Delaney went to a pregnancy forum, took all of the details there, and made them all into hyperbole. For someone who has never been pregnant or been close to someone that has been pregnant, this may not be an issue at all. For me, it was a constant source of annoyance that detracted even more from the plot. I read an interview with the author about his use of a pseudonym for this book. He talks about one of the reasons he liked it is because it makes the gender of the author ambiguous and he had a number of women tell him that they thought a woman wrote the book. NO. Just, no.

One of the worst things about this book, other than the cheesy dialogue and terrible sex scenes, are all of the smoking guns. Delany creates a whole table full of smoking guns, and then WALKS AWAY FROM THE TABLE. There’s a reason that everyone is so shocked that Simon is actually the murderer. It’s because it is completely outside of his character! That doesn’t make this a good story. It makes it an example of terrible writing.

And what about Edward and all of his crazy trying to recreate the relationship with Jane that he had with Emma? We never touch on that again, except in the very last paragraph where the reader is led to believe that more women would continue to move into this house and fall for this bag of cats. I wondered on more than one occasion while reading, if the author just hates women and/or just considers them all incredibly stupid.

Deep breaths.

Screen Shot 2017-07-28 at 9.46.29 PM.png

Final Thoughts: If you’ve followed my blog for a while, you know that I basically NEVER write negative reviews. But in this case, I felt like I must. I truly do not understand the hype. If you want a good psychological thriller, read all of the other books this one is compared to, and skip this one. Who else has read this? Did you love it or hate it? I’d love to hear your thoughts here.

Rating: Screen Shot 2018-01-04 at 12.25.30 AM

Favorite Characters: None

Memorable Quotes: There were several memorably bad quotes, but I did not make note of them.



5 thoughts on “The Girl Before – JP Delaney

  1. The LadyKing says:

    Woo, buddy. Unpacking this book has been a chore in my mind for too long because this book does not deserve the space it’s taking up in my brain.

    I’ll be honest that as the book was peaking at it’s most unbearable, I briefly thought the author could be ultimately trolling and he’d create a brilliant wrap up and YIKES was that giving this story way too much credit. And I’m wondering if a lot of the positive reviews of this book hinged on the same idea: this is a mess but I spent time getting to the end of it so I have to find SOMETHING I like about it, and they talk themselves into the first half of the book and say, that sort of made sense, I guess.


    I could not agree more that this was a table lined with fully loaded guns and every single one was left untouched. I can wade through a lot of useless muck in a book for a good story but I found myself too often saying: Why did that even just happen? Why are we wasting time on this? And after the ending, why didn’t we do ANY character fleshing out to make this more plausible instead of GOTCHA, didn’t see that coming did you?

    No. I didn’t. Because it was terrible story construction and as a reader, there is nothing more insulting than reading a story in which the author uses his characters to break the fourth wall and actually COMMEND where the ending went! (This literally happened. A character literally COMPLIMENTED THE END OF it’s OWN STORY.)

    I wanted to like this book because the premise seemed really awesome and I’m sad this was a wasted idea we won’t see fleshed out by someone who was willing to take more time being smart and less time being fantastical. And I feel pretty bad about tearing into it because everyone interprets stories differently, but this was a huge no-go for me and honestly, I’m not sure I’d read anything else from this author.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Juds says:

    Not so much hate as boredom, felt by sticking with this book. I had to come on-line to look for spoiler reviews to be able to dump it without guilt because I could not accept that it was a waste of precious reading time.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s